Google has pre-announced the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, a phone with a terrible name but 100% more hinges than the next iPhone — over to you, Apple

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
(Image credit: Google)

As we edge our way closer to the launch of the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro, the rest of the smartphone market isn't sitting on its hands and waiting. We already expected that Google would announce new Pixel phones soon enough and the company has now confirmed it — August 13 is the big day.

That unveiling will see the arrival of a slew of new handsets including the Pixel 9 and Pixel 9 Pro, but there's one phone that is sure to capture the attention more than the others and it's one that I'm particularly keen to take a look at. That phone is the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, a device that as the name suggests, will be foldable.

I've long had an interest in foldable phones of all shapes and sizes, although I admit that I'm more interested in phones that fold open into tablets than a reimagining of the flip phone years. Because of that, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold is right up my alley despite having a terrible name. But with the iPhone Fold (or whatever it winds up being called) still seemingly years away, Google's new foldable is just another reminder of just how far behind it's fallen in a key aspect of the smartphone world — excitement.

Terrible name, cool phone

We don't know all that much about the Pixel 9 Pro Fold right now and we might have to wait until next month to get the full details. That being said, Google's Pixel phones tend to leak more than a leaky thing in leaktown so perhaps not. But Google has given us a glimpse of what we can expect in terms of the image at the top of this piece and the video below this text.

That video focuses heavily on Gemini, the chatbot technology that is sure to be a focus of the phone's unveiling a month or so before Apple Intelligence launches on the iPhone with iOS 18.

Introducing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - YouTube Introducing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - YouTube
Watch On

I have to say the Pixel 9 Pro Fold (have I mentioned how terrible that name is yet?) is a looker, and I do find it a more aesthetically pleasing device than its contemporaries like the Samsung Galaxy Fold family. But I'll likely never buy one because I want my foldable phone to be an iPhone. I want it to run iOS and tie into iCloud and have all my photos, currently safe and sound in iCloud Photos.

So what gives, Apple? Sure, the iPhone 16 models look cool and I'll no doubt own an iPhone 16 Pro Max in some shade of gray by the end of September. But am I excited about that? Not really. I'm more excited about having a new screen that isn't scratched if I'm being absolutely honest. There's talk that the iPhone 17 will hold up better than its predecessors, thankfully. But it still won't fold.

Apple will never join a market until it thinks it can do it right, and it's hard to argue with successes like the Apple Watch and the iPhone. But it was relatively early to the game with the hugely expensive Apple Vision Pro, a device that isn't expected to sell well and instead seems designed to get people used to the idea of spatial computing. A foldable iPhone isn't too much to ask, is it?

I'm worried that I won't be excited about another iPhone until I can fold it in half. An iPhone Pro Max that turns into an iPad mini at will sounds like a productivity and gaming powerhouse. 

But Apple won't make one. And I now find myself looking at a Pixel and wishing that it ran iOS instead.

More from iMore

Oliver Haslam
Contributor

Oliver Haslam has written about Apple and the wider technology business for more than a decade with bylines on How-To Geek, PC Mag, iDownloadBlog, and many more. He has also been published in print for Macworld, including cover stories. At iMore, Oliver is involved in daily news coverage and, not being short of opinions, has been known to 'explain' those thoughts in more detail, too. Having grown up using PCs and spending far too much money on graphics card and flashy RAM, Oliver switched to the Mac with a G5 iMac and hasn't looked back. Since then he's seen the growth of the smartphone world, backed by iPhone, and new product categories come and go. Current expertise includes iOS, macOS, streaming services, and pretty much anything that has a battery or plugs into a wall. Oliver also covers mobile gaming for iMore, with Apple Arcade a particular focus. He's been gaming since the Atari 2600 days and still struggles to comprehend the fact he can play console quality titles on his pocket computer.

  • erikbock
    The real question is. What is the actual market for a foldable iPhone?
    Reply
  • Just_Me_D
    I’ve only seen a few people with a foldable phone in public, and by few I mean less than 5. I see iPhones, Google Pixels and Samsung smartphones, but mostly iPhones.

    With that being said, I’m not sitting around desiring a foldable iPhone and I don’t know anyone else who is.
    Reply
  • Ledsteplin
    I don't want a folding iPhone for the same reason I don't want a folio style case. I simply don't want to have to fold anything. I'm a grab and look person. Then there's the likely over the top price.
    Reply
  • FFR
    erikbock said:
    The real question is. What is the actual market for a foldable iPhone?

    It’s a shrinking market, with newly launched models declining in sales.


    Just_Me_D said:
    I’ve only seen a few people with a foldable phone in public, and by few I mean less than 5. I see iPhones, Google Pixels and Samsung smartphones, but mostly iPhones.

    With that being said, I’m not sitting around desiring a foldable iPhone and I don’t know anyone else who is.


    Here in Europe I haven’t seen a single foldable device, never seen anyone with a pixel, haven’t seen any Samsungs recently either. It’s just iPhones.

    Here in Italy on a remote island, even the taxi operators have all switched to iPhones and are using apples tap to pay for payment.
    Reply
  • SvenJ
    erikbock said:
    The real question is. What is the actual market for a foldable iPhone?
    You might be on to something there. Odd on a site that caters to a device and manufacturer that sells a lot based on cache'. It's clearly sort of aspirational to own a folding phone, in some circles, just as it is to own an iPhone, in some circles.
    Personally, I own a Surface Duo, and a Pixel Fold. Neither really makes my life substantially better than the plain slab iPhone and Pixel I own. I prefer the latter two. For Apple users, if you want a slightly bigger screen get an iPad Mini. You can do that and an iPhone for less than almost any foldable. Women can fit those in a purse, guys, get cargo pants.
    For what it's worth, I think the Surface Duo is actually more useful than the Pixel Fold. MS did a super job in support for multitasking, which to me, is the best reason for a foldable, not more screen real estate. Shame they couldn't make a case for it.
    Reply
  • FFR
    SvenJ said:
    You might be on to something there. Odd on a site that caters to a device and manufacturer that sells a lot based on cache'. It's clearly sort of aspirational to own a folding phone, in some circles, just as it is to own an iPhone, in some circles.
    Personally, I own a Surface Duo, and a Pixel Fold. Neither really makes my life substantially better than the plain slab iPhone and Pixel I own. I prefer the latter two. For Apple users, if you want a slightly bigger screen get an iPad Mini. You can do that and an iPhone for less than almost any foldable. Women can fit those in a purse, guys, get cargo pants.
    For what it's worth, I think the Surface Duo is actually more useful than the Pixel Fold. MS did a super job in support for multitasking, which to me, is the best reason for a foldable, not more screen real estate. Shame they couldn't make a case for it.

    I wouldn’t call foldables “aspirational” or try to compare it to the iPhone or Apple.

    Consumers seem to try it out of curiosity, then promptly move back to a slab phone, usually switching to a different brand after that experience.

    After 5 years, It’s a fast shrinking market of less than 1% and that’s with the generous 50%-60% firesale discounts offered with a trade in at launch and throughout the year. “Aspirational” brands typically don’t offer a discount, or in Microsoft’s case deprecate the product entirely.
    Reply
  • erikbock
    FFR said:
    It’s a shrinking market, with newly launched models declining in sales.





    Here in Europe I haven’t seen a single foldable device, never seen anyone with a pixel, haven’t seen any Samsungs recently either. It’s just iPhones.

    Here in Italy on a remote island, even the taxi operators have all switched to iPhones and are using apples tap to pay for payment.
    Exactly. Apple is a marketing company plain and simple. If their customer base really wants one and it is a significant number of the customers they will come out with it. If they don't see the market being significant enough they won't. Of course they have screwed up before so it could really be a crap shoot.
    Reply
  • erikbock
    Just_Me_D said:
    I’ve only seen a few people with a foldable phone in public, and by few I mean less than 5. I see iPhones, Google Pixels and Samsung smartphones, but mostly iPhones.

    With that being said, I’m not sitting around desiring a foldable iPhone and I don’t know anyone else who is.
    I have a friend that has the Samsung flip and his wife has the foldable. Funny thing is they migrated from iPhone to Android. That's the thing I question them most on.
    Reply
  • FFR
    erikbock said:
    Exactly. Apple is a marketing company plain and simple. If their customer base really wants one and it is a significant number of the customers they will come out with it. If they don't see the market being significant enough they won't. Of course they have screwed up before so it could really be a crap shoot.

    Samsung spends around 14 billion a year in advertising before they stopped disclosing the amount a couple of years ago.

    Even with all that marketing and a 60% firesale discount, foldables are below 1 percent of the smartphone market and declining yoy.
    Reply