iPhone 17 Air could be the name of the next-gen super-slim Apple phone

iPhone 15 Pro on a tree stump
(Image credit: Gerald Lynch / Future / Apple)

The iPhone 17 might still be a year off given that we haven’t even had the iPhone 16 yet, but there are still rumors abound that give us a fleeting glimpse of what 2025 might have in store for us. One of the most prolific rumors has been that the iPhone 17 is going to have a ‘slim’ version, and now we have a better idea of what it’s going to be called — the iPhone 17 Air.

Traditionally, the ‘Air naming convention denotes the slimmest and lightest of the Apple product at hand — while that’s shifted slightly after the unreasonably thin iPad Pro M4 (that’s thinner than the new iPad Air M2), it looks to mean the same for the iPhone 17. According to Youtuber FrontPageTech, the iPhone Air will sit between the standard models and the Pro models, just like the iPads with the same moniker.

More slim devices

Introducing iPhone Air - YouTube Introducing iPhone Air - YouTube
Watch On

With any luck, the iPhone 17 Air will not suffer the same fate as the notorious, and also extremely thin, iPhone 6. The 17 Air is pegged to have a waistline of just 5mm, a whole 2.8 inches slimmer than the iPhone 15. That’s a mighty thin phone — and one that without significant structural work would likely bend like a banana. Cue flashbacks to unintended flexible iPhones in 2014, and the BendGate scandal that still puts some buyers off iPhones today.

Thankfully, it seems like we’re going to be getting an iPhone Air made from some strong materials to put your mind at ease. While FrontPageTech reckons there won’t be as much Titanium as the Pro models, there could be some to keep the phone rigid in those skinny jeans pockets, and make sure it stays ruler straight. The chip inside isn’t going to be as impressive as the Pro and Pro Max chips, but will likely match those found in the iPhone 17 when it releases — and, of course, support Apple Intelligence.

The sticking point? Price. The iPhone could cost as much, apparently, as $1,299 — a whole lot of money for a phone that doesn’t have the screen, processor, or power of the Pro line. We’d expect it to land between the Pro and standard iPhones instead. Even then, as TechRadar points out, a lot of this rumor feels more like speculation rather than solid, well-sourced rumors, so any one of the predictions at hand could be wrong. We’ll only know for sure when the iPhone 17 starts to come closer into view, and before that, we’ve got the iPhone 16 family and Apple Intelligence to worry about.

More from iMore

Tammy Rogers
Senior Staff Writer

As iMore's Senior Staff writer, Tammy uses her background in audio and Masters in screenwriting to pen engaging product reviews and informative buying guides. The resident audiophile (or audio weirdo), she's got an eye for detail and a love of top-quality sound. Apple is her bread and butter, with attention on HomeKit and Apple iPhone and Mac hardware. You won't find her far away from a keyboard even outside of working at iMore – in her spare time, she spends her free time writing feature-length and TV screenplays. Also known to enjoy driving digital cars around virtual circuits, to varying degrees of success. Just don't ask her about AirPods Max - you probably won't like her answer.

  • erikbock
    Did Jony design it? He was obsessed with thinner and thinner iPhones. I appreciate the thinner iPad Pro but not sure about this for a phone. I fear the return of Bendgate.
    Reply
  • FFR
    erikbock said:
    Did Jony design it? He was obsessed with thinner and thinner iPhones. I appreciate the thinner iPad Pro but not sure about this for a phone. I fear the return of Bendgate.
    He very well could have
    Reply
  • Ledsteplin
    How does "thinner" make the iPhone any better? They're pretty thin already. They've come a long way.

    Reply
  • Wotchered
    The iPhone has always favoured "thinness" at the expense of battery run time. So every tiny advance in the electrical frugality of the iPhone goes to drive a wider,taller but thinner phone. To what useful end ?
    I would prefer to be able to go away on Friday and come back and plug the thing in on Monday, without having to carry a mini rucksack full of gubbins to service my comms needs, I'd happily accept a phone an eighth of an inch thicker to get that.
    Reply
  • Just_Me_D
    Ledsteplin said:
    How does "thinner" make the iPhone any better? They're pretty thin already. They've come a long way.


    I suppose there are people who would like to see an iPhone as thin as a credit card. Those of us who are old enough to remember the Motorola Dynatech phone and the bag phone are astounded by the thinness of smartphones today. On top of that, the old phones could only make and receive phone calls, and if you wanted to make a call while driving/riding in vehicle, you needed an external antenna.
    Reply