Update, August 24 (7:30 pm ET): Written order on the temporary restraining order to come "shortly"
What you need to know
- US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers gave partial hope to Epic in Monday's hearing.
- The judge said she was inclined to prevent Apple from blocking access to developer tools.
- She did not, however, seem to agree with Epic's request to allow Fortnite back on the App Store.
Epic may have won over the judge in the Epic v. Apple court case - partially.
In a tweet by Apple analyst and leaker Mark Gurman, United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers says that she was "inclined" to stop Apple from blocking Epic's access to developer tools in order to develop and distribute Unreal Engine. She is not, however, inclined to force Apple to allow Fortnite on the App Store while the company bypasses Apple's in-app purchase requirements.
Judge in Epic vs Apple case says she is "inclined" to NOT grant relief for the Fornite removal (as in, to not force Apple to put it back on the App Store,) but IS "inclined" to not let Apple block Epic from developing/distributing Unreal Engine. Inclined is not a decision.Judge in Epic vs Apple case says she is "inclined" to NOT grant relief for the Fornite removal (as in, to not force Apple to put it back on the App Store,) but IS "inclined" to not let Apple block Epic from developing/distributing Unreal Engine. Inclined is not a decision.— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) August 24, 2020August 24, 2020
Sarah Jeong, who is live tweeting the hearing, showed that the judge blames Epic for creating the mess that it is now in.
"Your client created this situation. Your client does not come to this action with clean hands ..... in my view, you cannot have irreparable harm when you create the harm yourself."
To Epic: "Your client created this situation. Your client does not come to this action with clean hands ..... in my view, you cannot have irreparable harm when you create the harm yourself."To Epic: "Your client created this situation. Your client does not come to this action with clean hands ..... in my view, you cannot have irreparable harm when you create the harm yourself."— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 24, 2020August 24, 2020
She went further to almost recommend that, instead of a temporary restraining order, that Epic make the changes that Apple asked of it so that Fortnite could return to the App Store while the legal battle was decided in April of 2021.
YGR: All you have to do is take out the (hotfix) and return to the status quo, and then we can have our trial date in April. So far I haven't heard anything that they can't flip the switch to the way it was to August 3 and return everybody to the way they were.YGR: All you have to do is take out the (hotfix) and return to the status quo, and then we can have our trial date in April. So far I haven't heard anything that they can't flip the switch to the way it was to August 3 and return everybody to the way they were.— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 24, 2020August 24, 2020
Update, August 24 (7:30 pm ET) — Written order on the temporary restraining order to come "shortly"
US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers adjourned the hearing, saying that a written order on the temporary restraining order will be coming "shortly." According to the remarks at the hearing, it appears that an order will be granted that will not allow Apple to block developer tool access for Unreal Engine.
My immediate reaction is that it's pretty obvious that the TRO re: Fortnite will not be granted, but it's likely there will be a TRO re: Unreal Engine (unblocking that dev account, presumably).My immediate reaction is that it's pretty obvious that the TRO re: Fortnite will not be granted, but it's likely there will be a TRO re: Unreal Engine (unblocking that dev account, presumably).— sarah jeong (@sarahjeong) August 24, 2020August 24, 2020
